Personal experience in the war in Counter- Attack Essay

By considering unmatchable of the verse forms that you have read, explain how the poet presents their view of the deviation Counter-AttackSiegfried Sassoon presents his personal experience in the war in Counter- Attack with raw brutal imagery of the battlefield, the many a(prenominal) sensory feelings evoke terror and outrage at the war, coupled with the hard demarcation line of report-like state custodyts to ultimately experience the futility of the date, and the massive waste of life.Sassoon immediately establishes the sense of frantic purloinment in the difference the opening strains just now state that they had gained (their) first objective hours sooner, provoking shame at the accompaniment that spends were labored to bout in inhumane conditions and ultimately were made to detach themselves from the terror of watching their friends being murdered.A semi-omniscient story is maintained to establish the collective horror of the war, the particular that co mpletely soldiers would close to always face the identical sight as the previous had and remains mend throughout the poem as the contrast to the delirious detachment presented. The poet constitutes how at first even before the attack begins the soldiers are already blind with stool, yet they are made to continue to hunt start as soon as dawn begins all the soldiers are immediately laboured to join in with the clink of shovels, a sign of the hard conditions of biography in the trenches, while the militaristic onomatopoeia coincides with the perceived orderliness, such as the bombers posted and Lewis guns sound placed.The poet because establishes the horror of the some methodical methods to which the war was fought, and that the close that would come later made to seem almost mechanical. Sassoon similarly emphasises that these soldiers are simply normal men, many whom are young and forced to fight when he describes how prior to the counter-attack, there was a yawnin g soldier kneeling across the bank in order to accompaniment their morale up, they are forced to become sardonic, sarcastically describing the weather as the jolly old rainwater, yet serving to reinforce the message that the conflict has forced people to become detached from their emotions and feelings.The horror of the battlefield is also clearly defined Sassoon describes the clean life in the trenches even before the counter-attack to be one rotten with of a sudden green feckless legs. The use of rotten inherently suggests that the battlefield is skillful of bodies, many of which are likely to be decomposing which except heightens the horror in which these soldiers must live their occasional lives. They are in effect also forced to separate themselves from the sights death is a normality in warfare, and the raw description of various soldiers sprawled and grovelled on the trenches defines the bare brutality they face.The men are reduced from strong, fitted men who were previously high-booted to being helpless in the face of war, some even draw as eventually dying face downward, a possible reference to the conflict notwithstanding carry doom to their lives. The battlefield is not only strewn with immeasurable bodies, but also described as perfidious itself the mud is personified as sucking the fallen soldiers down into it with little remorse, creating a sense of the indignity of the soldiers deaths. The soldiers that are so far lively are simply wallowing like trodden sand-bags, peculiarity of the hopelessness and lack of control in the post they face. They are also metaphorically loosely-filled, hinting possibly that these men are also physically as well as mentally exhausted, hence the soldier having knelt against the bank.The fulminant switch from the collection of soldiers to the single one in the second stanza points towards Sassoons idea of the wrongs of war the stark veritableity that war costs numerous lives and distributively so ldier is in effect a hearty life, the one about to be lost in the war is as just as important. To describe the intensity of the conflict, the poet describes how this single soldier responds with such idolatry in that he becomes mute in the blaring of s underworlds, simply reduced as he recoils from the sign shock of warfare.Yet rather than recovering from his initial shock, ultimately the soldier is described by Sassoon as helpless, as he crouched and flinched, dizzy with galloping fear, reduced almost to primal instinct when faced with such a large strangled horror. The battlefield along with its weaponry spouts dark earth and wire with gusts from hell the poet explains the terrible nature of the war, likened to hell wrecking its ending onto the battlefield, and in the remnants of the carnage the soldier can only hear the butchered, frantic gestures of the dead an oxymoron to establish the fact that death on the battlefield is so sharp and brutal it is literally incomprehens ible.Sassoons view of the conflict is described as being ultimately delusive the first stanza already indicates that there are numerous bulged, clotted heads scattered throughout, grotesque imagery that also provides an ominous undertone to the counter-attack. These bodies are also described as sleeping rather than the stark reality that they are dead, pointing to the normality of the situation. To add further to the futility, even the incumbent of the trench is blundering, somewhat dark comedy in the face of terrible times, and he continues only by gasping and bawling in shock. In contrast to the dead lifeless nature of the soldiers, it is the ammunition that is fully alive in this case bullets spat at them, traversing certain(p) as fate, and never a dud, adding to the demonstration of death in the conflict.The soldier Sassoon describes ultimately meets his fate in a spout of confusion indicated by the sudden ellipses in his thoughts and he remembered his rifle quick fire Notabl y the soldier himself cannot remember to suitcase onto his own rifle shock is combined with futility in that the soldier cannot arm himself and is therefore helpless, akin to almost all the other soldiers in the trenches. His fate is one that ends with him having bled to death. Heavy consonants throughout the line along with repetition emphasise the futile nature in which he dies Down, and down, and down, he sank and drowned.The poem establishes Sassoons spirit of the conflict being one filled with horror, forced emotional detachment and ultimately the underlying futility of the war in the soldiers confusion and the mechanical killing presented. The poem never aligns with any set line grammatical construction in order to add to this confusion, and the poem is unopen with the simple factual statement the counter-attack had failed, in line with the opening line to create a contrast and show the real brutal nature of war people become numbers rather than the real human beings pres ented in the second stanza.